Question by Katey: What need to the USA do when marijuana floods the States from California?
What really should the USA do when marijuana floods the States from California? Men and women are going to commence establishment to get and sell marijuana to guests who will targeted traffic it in trade to all 50 states, excluding Hawaii. This is going to be in thousands of cars. What can the States do to make California pay for this?
They are refusing to manage marijuana/THC and eventually will turn out to be the main supplier of marijuana to the USA. Can the US Govt stop California from harming it is citizens and the USA by refusing to manage marijuana/THC? The Fourteenth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution reads: Section 1 nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
California is denying it’s citizens equal protection of the laws of protection of a proscribed substance, marijuana?
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution reads:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and topic to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, with out awaited process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Seeds will be included, so you can buy marijuana seeds or your very own lab
Finest key:
Key by Dae Lother
Invest in the organizations that make junkfood (Prinkles, Lays, entamains, dunkin donuts) prior to the munchies hit.
Know greater? Leave your own key in the comments!
WOW, you are about 200 being excessively late. You can go anywhere and buy that material. It’s more common than cigarettes.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html
The Feds consider it a proscribed substance and it IS illegal despite what addicts and drug dealers in California might want.
The Supreme Court has already ruled recently that IS within the Feds jurisdiction to protect us from the interests of addicts and dealer.
Don’t vote to re-elect Obama – conundrum solved. The centralized regime has authority to enforce centralized law even in the State of California. Marijuana is a proscribed substance under Centralized Law. If California legalizes marijuana, the Centralized Regime can arrest and prosecute all growers & suppliers in California. In fact, they can also arrest anyone who possesses marijuana. Even if, Obama’s policy is to not enforce Centralized law as regards marijuana in the State of California.
In person, I do not have a strong opinion either way as to whether it is legal or illegal. Even if, you do raise a excellent point. Those states who have deemed marijuana to be illegal will now have an even harder time enforcing these laws. Although marijuana is quite common, legalization will increase the supply, and decrease the expense. Thus, it will be even cheaper and simpler to obtain than cigarettes.
You are confusing a citizen of the United States, with that of Citizens of The State of California.
The Fourteenth Amendment is NOT the contolling law, it is really Article 1, Section 10 (Right to Contract). In other words, all 14th amendment “persons” have contracted themselves into the social security trust by signature. The social trust is bankrupt and Household of representatives is the trustee to the bankruptcy, thus even bits and pieces like the 14th amendment fall under spirit and meaning (color of law). Also, all 14th amendment “persons” are detained accountable to all codes & statutes under “operation of law.”
The 14th Amendment is an executive order (proclamation) Vol. 1 of Presidential Executive Instructions, 2 vols. (N.Y.: Books, Inc., 1944—Copyright by Mayor of N.Y. 1944).
14th amendment made US Citizens, which are determined to be found in extensions of Constituency of Columbia! Do you reside in the Constituency of Columbia? Look at definition of “person” as found in your local STATE code.
“[T]he stretch ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’…is affirmative and declaratory, intended to allay doubts and to settle controversies which had arisen with respect to citizenship.” Francis Wharton, A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws or Private International Law, 3rd ed. (Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co., 1906), vol. 1, pp. 45-47.
You also might want to rethink your stance since 75% of all marijuana currently comes crosswise the Mexican border. It appears that you have been brainwashed by the social-democrats. California has always lead the nation in weed production, they are merely “expressing” their independent side and using an existing resource to minimize STATE debt.
News flash, the us is already flooded with marijuana, and has been for a long time.
Do you know that over 2/3 of hs teens report simple acces to marijuana, compared to less than 1/3 that have simple door to alcohol and tobacco??
Legalization is the key here, not banning.
Harming its citizens? Refusing to control?
Refusing to control is what they are doing right now with keeping it illegal. Its a emancipated for all on a black market.
Harming its citizens? Do you know the before drug czar specifically sees the escaluting violence surrounding that black market as a measure of our success? The dead bodies are his trophies. Legalizing marijuana will HELP the citizens. Not only since of the violent black market, but give a safer alternative to tobacco and alcohol.